Course feedback


back

Course feedback based on the comments of the participants (participants' names suppressed)


Rated satisfaction of participants with the course.

  Not satisfied   Highly satisfied
Scale for rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No of responses             3 2 3 8

Average % = 90%


Criteria for course rating

Rated aspects of the course

Total number of responses for different categories

Excellent Very Good Good Fair
Contents 14 2    
Course material 11 3 1  
Lecturer’s knowledge & teaching skills 13 2 1  
Practical exercises 11 4 1  
Course timeframe 9 6   1


Summary of responses on worthwhile things learnt by the participants during the course

  • EIA framework and the best ways to approach EIA.

  • The linkage between the natural disasters and the environment services.

  • Importance of economic evaluation of biodiversity and the cost benefit analysis.

  • Definitions and concept of biodiversity offsets.

  • Case studies demonstrating application of global best practices, offsets and mitigation options for environmental problems.

  • Importance of scoping, economic valuation of impacts and biodiversity offsets were most informative topics.

  • The interrelationships between ecology and economy.

  • The need to conserve our resources for maintaining ecological balance.

  • Incorporation of biodiversity & economics in EIA.

  • Strategy for good scoping.

  • Millennium Development Goals.

  • Application of impact matrix.

  • Tools and techniques for establishing biological baselines.

  • Group exercises.

  • Economic evaluation of biodiversity losses.
     

Summary of responses on things that helped the participants work effectively

  • Scoping using the matrix table.

  • Brainstorming exercises were very effective/informative.

  • Group exercises on scoping and role play simulation.

  • Good resource material and well organized lectures and presentations.

  • The handy information and the interaction with the instructors.

  • Interactive sessions and role playing exercises.

  • Instructor provided their best regarding the subject matter.

  • Good food.

  • Time schedule and course organizations.

  • Good examples and cases.

  • Good learning atmosphere.
     

Summary of responses on the things that kept the participants from being more effective

  • Lack of glossary for some of the terminologies used.

  • Limited discussions on valuing biodiversity.

  • Frequency of breaks.

  • More number of cases from industries should be included.
     

Summary of the comments on specific content of the course that the participants found useful

  • Valuation of biodiversity.

  • Understanding the ecological functions.

  • Examples related to the experiences of participants.

  • Actual activity on valuation of biological entities.
     

General comments and suggestions

  • The course should run for 4 - 5 days sessions with more exercises.

  • Overall excellent arrangements, good food, perfect time management and meticulous planning of the course.

  • All the arrangements were excellent.

  • We were comfortably put up in the hotel, food was good and course was planned with utmost care.

  • Use of more case studies recommended and the case studies should include more marine related projects.

  • A quiz to see how much information has been absorbed/ grasped by participants was recommended.
     

General comments and suggestions

  • Environmental Economic Threshold Levels

  • Disaster management.

  • Tools for socio-economic assessment like PRA techniques.

  • Guidance on preparation of wildlife conservation plans as part of mitigation planning.

  • Focus on mining sector w.r.t. impact assessment and mitigation measures; Social impact assessment on R&R plans.

  • Specific training for EIA of hydropower projects.

  • Specific training for EIA of mining projects.

  • Strategies for evolving mitigation measures.

  • Niche/ Habitat modelling GIS, EIA & SIA.

  • GIS, ecosystem modeling and economic evaluation approaches for biodiversity inclusive impact assessment.

  • Economic evaluation of biodiversity.

  • Economic valuation of biodiversity with special reference to aquatic ecosystem.