Feedback

Training Course on Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Impact Assessment for Indian Forest Service Officers (12th - 13th August 2010)
EVALUATION REPORT BY THE PARTICIPANT
[Note: Please fill in all the items in the reports Your objectivity will help us to make improvements in the future training course (s)]
Number of participants : 19
1. Name of the institution/organization : Wildlife Institute of India
2. Title of the training Course : Two Day Training Workshop on Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Impact Assessment” for IFS Officers.
3. Duration & period of the training Course : Two days (12th to 13th August 2010)
4. Training Course objectives
![]() |
To improve the understanding of the mechanisms to mainstream biodiversity in the EIA framework for good reporting and sound decision making. |
![]() |
To empower the natural resource managers to appreciate issues and conflicts related to developments through ecologically sensitive areas. |
5. Did you receive advance intimation from the institute/ organization about the programme? If so, when did you respond to the institution?
(a) When the intimation was received? : Generally a fortnight before the course
(b) When the officer responded? : Generally a week before the course
6. What do you think about the theme/topic structure and organization of the training course to meet the objectives on a scale of 10?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 1 |
Overall rating 88%
7. How useful the information provided/interactions made in this training course will be to you in your job?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 |
Overall rating 84%
8. Do you feel you got enough opportunities to interact with the fellow participants?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 5 |
Overall rating 85%
9. How far have you been benefited from interactions with the fellow participants during the training course ?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
Overall rating 85%
10. How far the reading material supplied was relevant and related to the topic of the training course?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Overall rating 85%
11. Do you feel the institute/ organization made enough efforts in providing the maximum possible information on the theme/topic?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
Overall rating 89%
12. To what extent are you satisfied with the following?
(The institution may phase block the parameters not applicable)
[10...................................... 00]
(highest) (lowest)
a. Reception:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
Overall rating 86%
b. Transport facilities availed/not availed: If availed:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
Overall rating 92%
c. Residential accommodation Facilities availed/not availed If availed:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 4 | 14 |
Overall rating 97%
d. Food quality and service:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 3 | 6 | 10 |
Overall rating 94%
e. Conference room facilities:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 8 | 10 |
Overall rating 95%
f. Library facilities availed/not availed, If availed:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 1 |
g. Interactions with the faculty and fellow participants:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
Overall rating 85%
13. Which part (s) of the brainstorming sessions did you find most useful?
![]() |
Strategic Environmental Assessment |
![]() |
Narmadasagar Project Case study |
![]() |
Best practices for mitigating impacts on biodiversity |
![]() |
Strengthening partnership between industry & forestry sectors for improved outcome from impact assessment |
![]() |
Application of biodiversity offsets and panel discussion on role of foresters in professionalizing EIA in biodiversity conservation |
![]() |
Complete training course was useful |
![]() |
All sessions were very useful |
![]() |
Mitigative measures in EIA |
![]() |
Most of the interactions during the sessions |
![]() |
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) for forestry sector |
![]() |
Ways & means of mainstreaming environmental issues in development projects |
![]() |
Role of Quality Control Council |
![]() |
Role of foresters in EIA report |
14. Your overall impression of the training course ?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
Overall rating 90%
15. Any other comments/observations/suggestions you wish to make about the sponsoring of training course in future and the suggested topics/themes.
![]() |
Presenting more case studies on the topics. |
![]() |
Include valuation of ecosystem services approach. |
![]() |
Duration of training should atleast be 3-5 days. |
![]() |
It is very useful course for Forest Officer and should also be provided to other concerned departments. |
![]() |
Excellent training course |
![]() |
It may be continued in the same manner with more case details on mining in RF areas. |
![]() |
More reading material |
![]() |
Detailed methodology and steps to be included in the EIA process with a case study |
![]() |
Include recently published book “Biodiversity in Environmental Assessment: Enhancing Ecosystem Services for Human Well-Being” in the course material |
Last Updated: February 20, 2013