Feedback

Training Course on Environmental Impact Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation for Indian Forest Service Officers (7th - 11th September 2009)
EVALUATION REPORT BY THE PARTICIPANT
[Note: Please fill in all the items in the reports Your objectivity will help us to make improvements in the future training course (s)]
Number of participants : 20
Name of the institution/organization : Wildlife Institute of India
1. Title of the training Course : One Week Compulsory Training Course on “Environmental Impact Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation” for IFS Officers.
2. Duration & period of the training Course : Five days (7th to 11th September 2009)
Training Course objectives
![]() |
To improve the understanding of the mechanisms to mainstream biodiversity in the EIA framework for good reporting and sound decision making. |
![]() |
To empower the natural resource managers to appreciate issues and conflicts related to developments through ecologically sensitive areas. |
3. Did you receive advance intimation from the institute/ organization about the programme? If so, when did you respond to the institution?
(a) When the intimation was received?
(b) When the officer responded?
4. What do you think about the theme/topic structure and organization of the training course to meet the objectives on a scale of 10?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
Overall rating 84%
5. How useful the information provided/interactions made in this training course will be to you in your job?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
Overall rating 81%
6. Do you feel you got enough opportunities to interact with the fellow participants?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
Overall rating 88%
7. How far have you been benefited from interactions with the fellow participants during the training course ?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
Overall rating 85%
8. How far the reading material supplied was relevant and related to the topic of the training course?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
Overall rating 84%
9. Do you feel the institute/ organization made enough efforts in providing the maximum possible information on the theme/topic?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 5 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
Overall rating 87%
10. To what extent are you satisfied with the following? (The institution may phase block the parameters not applicable)
[10...................................... 00]
(highest) (lowest)
a. Reception:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
Overall rating 87%
b. Transport facilities availed/not availed: If availed:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
Overall rating 88%
c. Residential accommodation Facilities availed/not availed If availed:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 2 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
Overall rating 93%
d. Food quality and service:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
Overall rating 90%
e. Conference room facilities:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
Overall rating 89%
f. Library facilities availed/not availed, If availed:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 1 |
g. Interactions with the faculty and fellow participants:
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
Overall rating 83%
11. Which part (s) of the brainstorming sessions did you find most useful?
![]() |
Exposure to EIA & SEA as a tool in environmental decision making |
![]() |
Reforms in environmental governance |
![]() |
The speakers of WII and Kalpvriksh were most useful in understanding SEA, biodiversity and EIA |
![]() |
Sessions by Ashish Kothari, Anupam Joshi |
![]() |
Addressing impacts of climate change. |
![]() |
Conservation development issues in Rajaji National Park. |
![]() |
Strengthening partnership between forestry & industry sector. |
![]() |
Impacts of development projects on tiger habitats, implication for tiger conservation. |
![]() |
Narmada valley project case study. |
![]() |
Panel discussion. |
12. Your overall impression of the training course ?
Scale | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
No of responses | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
Overall rating 84%
13. Any other comments/observations/suggestions you wish to make about the sponsoring of Training course in future and the suggested topics/themes.
![]() |
Include protocol for assessment of biodiversity in an area. |
![]() |
More case studies of mitigation measures. |
![]() |
There should be full day excursion of nearby biodiversities like Rajaji National Park, Corbett National Park etc. |
![]() |
More subject related field visits may be included. |
![]() |
Literature on economic education tools & biodiversity mapping should be provided. |
![]() |
Instead of class room session, field experience may be exposed. |
![]() |
Besides theory, discussion on practical should be included in the training course. |
![]() |
WII has excellent infrastructure for conducting training programmes. The classrooms sessions of this course must be conducted in WII campus. |
![]() |
The classroom sessions should be integrated with field visits. |
![]() |
Specific examples factoring in the experiences from the states should be solicited. |
Last Updated: January 24, 2013